Overview
Need vs. Allocation by litigation
Allocated FTE (synthetic roster) compared with judicial need derived from public JCC workload data.
Where are the next judges most needed?
Top need gaps (need β allocated), by district.
About this demo
A prototype of a judicial allocation dashboard, shown on a fictional court. It is not an official court product and contains no internal court data.
Need vs. Allocation
Gap = judicial need β allocated FTE. Need = FY23β25 avg JWS workload hours Γ 60 Γ· 77,400-min work year (2018 JWS), from public LA County data scaled to 25%. The district split of need and all allocations are synthetic.
| Litigation | Allocated FTE | Judicial need | Gap | Filings (3-yr avg) |
|---|
Need gap by district
| District | JOs | Allocated FTE | Est. need | Gap | Open ctrms |
|---|
Filing trend by JCC case-weight category
JCC Operational Metrics case types β public LA County filings, FY2016βFY2025, scaled to 25% for this fictional court. Implied case weight = JWS workload minutes Γ· filings; need FTE = 3-yr-avg workload Γ· 77,400-min work year.
All JCC case-weight categories
Click a row to chart its 10-year trend. Appeals carries no JWS case weight, so it has no need figure.
| Category | Litigation | Implied weight (min) | β | β | β | 3-yr avg | Ξ FY23β25 | Need (FTE) |
|---|
Courtroom availability by district
Open / Closed / Dark counts (synthetic). Click a district to list its courthouses below.
Courthouses
Click a courthouse to see its departments, judicial officers and allocations.
| Courthouse | District | Rooms | Open | JOs | Allocated FTE |
|---|
Assignment move simulator
Build a scenario of one or more judicial moves, then simulate them together to see the combined impact on need-gaps and resources. Nothing is saved.
| # | Judicial officer | From β To | FTE |
|---|
Judicial officers
Fictional roster β officers are identified only by title and department. Search by courthouse, department or district.
| Name | Title | District | Courthouse | Dept | Room | Litigation | FTE |
|---|